 | | | Please support our sponsors and let them know you heard about their products on Cruisers Forums. | | 31-10-2011, 02:58 | | | | that will be comfortable on . I have seen a 1969 26 MKII for $4500. She looks to be in good shape from the pictures, but I haven't seen her yet. I'm interested in knowing if this would be a suitable for the Bay, maybe light coastal trips. Also, what's the general consensus on the overall quality of built of this era? I realize I'm going to have to go through her with a fine tooth comb to make sure she is sea-worthy, but that's ok, I just want a good quality boat for a starting point. | | | | | 31-10-2011, 04:48 | | Boat: (Cruiser Living On Dirt)
|
| | | | | 31-10-2011, 05:41 | | Boat: Jon Sayer 1-off 46 ft fract rig sloop strip plank in W Red Cedar
| followed by a professional is required to weed out the floating disasters.
Good luck.
Jim
PS I've seen a couple of them in Oz. Don;t know how they got there but they are still floating and sailing. | | | | | 31-10-2011, 10:47 | | Boat: Tartan 30 & Columbia 26
| , so I can compare.
The C26M2 is a heavy boat for it's length. We're talking 5900 lb , with 2500 of those lbs just in the . This makes for a very stable and boat. Combine that with the high freeboard, and you've got a boat that stays dry in nasty conditions and doesn't heel too much. So as a safe, comfortable cruiser capable of whatever you throw at it in terms of and waves, it's excellent.
As neer as I can tell, the and are pretty bulletproof. I've smacked some obstacles pretty hard at speed, without so much as a blemish. The and standing appear to be quite stout in comparison to other similar boats. These boats were made with two rigging options: standard and . The has two sets of shrouds leading to the base of the spreaders instead of one, and also adds a car track on the and some other goodies. Mine's the standard, but if the one your looking at has the racing rigging that's a big bonus.
Sail area is slightly on the small side compared to other boats of the same size that are more geared to performance. Fairly small main with large masthead .
So ... you're saying "heavy, high freeboard, small sail area, this thing must sail like a PIG right?". Here's the wierd thing ... NO! Ol' Bill Tripp did something right when he designed this . I mine regularly, and it seems to hold it's own nicely against the Thunderbirds, J24's, SJ28's etc. It seems to have a slippery hull or something, because once it get's it's momentum up, I'm passing those other boats on a reach and downwind (she SCREAMS downwind either with a or wing & wing with a poled out genny). But, it doesn't point real well, and on tacks it loses all momentum and takes a while to accelerate again. But once you learn the tricks of how to take advantage of it's strengths, she's a great performer. I also do a lot of cruising with other boats, and it's great to be able to keep up with the rest of the fleet, even the big boys. Many other boats this size get left behind on such outings.
There are some negatives on this boat. I don't like the free hung spade hanging way back there. It seems delicate. When I bought mine, it had a severe problem, which I found out was a bent shaft. I fixed that and now it perfectly balanced, but I can see how a grounding or hitting something from the rear could easily bend that rudder. I'd prefer a skeg or hung rudder. But ... I gotta say that old tub does turn on a dime!
These were mass produced, cheaply built boats, and that's reflected in the fit and finish. You won't find nice woodwork or signs of craftsmanship. But if you don't mind plain, the is reasonably roomy and comfortable for a 26 footer.
There are a LOT of C26's out there, partly because so many were built, and partly because they were built like so a high proportion are still floating. This means they can be had real , sometimes even free if you don't mind putting serious grease into an abandoned marina derelict. $4500 may be a reasonable if the one you're looking at is in real good shape, although if you're willing to wait and look around you might be able to do better. In my opinion, these boats are one of the most undervalued bargains out there.
I'm sure I could go on and on, but PM me if you have any more questions about my experience with my C26M2. Good luck! | | | | | 31-10-2011, 11:05 | | | | and sail fairly well too. The rudder is exposed and I have heard of one problem with the rudder shaft badly corroded. There is a 30 up here with good inboard for $6k, so dont pay too much for a 26! - Elmore Leonard
| | | | | 04-09-2012, 16:09 | | | | almost never gets wet. The top sits roughly 4.5 feet above the waterline. The boat is heavy and like a tank, very forgiving. It absolutely does just scream downwind with just a up (I did 7.8 kts in a 20+ kt with 2-3 foot following seas). It points upwind quite well, sharpest upwind I've been is 15 degrees off the wind and we were moving along pretty well, we porpised the dingy we were going so fast on that tack in light winds. The is pretty roomy, it can sleep 2 couples and a . The doubles are a bit small for two if you arent cuddle buddies, when I bring my buddies out it sleeps 3. Construction of the lower hull is solid, the fibreglass is about an inch thick down there.
The downsides I've noticed: Motoring in waves of any size is horrible, it hobby horses up and down. Under sail however, this thing just pounds through them. With the high freeboard again, under , it will catch the wind and point you off the wind and can be difficult to steer under . The well is in a terrible place in the , on my boat the whole well has been sealed shut and a transom mount placed on the back, in the it would be loud, smelly, and you'd end up kicking it all the time. On the transom its much better, although combined with the hobby horsing means a lot of cantilevering the prop out of the when motoring in waves, something that the designers tried to fix with the well in the cockpit I guess.
When I say it sails like a tank, I mean it. I went out with a few inexperienced guys this past weekend and the that called for 10-15 kt winds turned out to be 20-30 gust 50. Closehauled under the 20-30 kt prevailing with a 150 we were heeled only at 15-20 degrees. The gusts blew us to 40-50 degree heel within a second, but that wasnt really the boat's fault; a 150 genoa isnt designed for 50 kt winds, and with my limited experience and a totally green crew swapping sails was not an option at all.
When you get your crew working smoothly you wont lose much speed on your tacks and jibes, but if your crew is sloppy on the tacks and gybes as wrist mentions you will lose almost all of your speed.
If you plan your and tacks well however you can make some pretty good time in the boat, and if the inside configuration is stock and unmodified there are two extra compartments that can hold so you can put extra ice in them and store cold, one in the v-berth and one underneath the . The does a pretty good job of keeping your cold with ice. Lots of elsewhere on the boat. We keep a months worth of food, and crabbing , , clothes, tons of extra lifejackets, blankets, pillows, four extra sails, dishes, tools, downriggers and a whole host of other crap on the boat and there's still room for 50 , 30 bottles of water, four bottles of and 15 2-litre bottles of pop and she isnt even full, with the compartments closed there is nothing lying loose anywhere.
Hopefully you got the boat and are living it up aboard by now! | | | | | 04-09-2012, 16:45 | | Boat: 1976 Sabre 28-2
| and boat would round up. No single handing that boat without an auto pilot.
Boat pounded badly and canned going to in short period steep waves of the channels. canning busted the tabbing loose on the forward and amidships bulkheads after a couple of trips to Lahaina from HNL. Couldn't recommend any serious big ocean sailing without reinforcing the hull and a lot better bonding of the bulkheads to the hull.
Mine was a '79 and came with a roller reefing and boom. Terrible system. Be sure the main has been converted to slab reefing. You'll be reefing often or just not using the main.
volume was tremendous for a 26' boat so it was great for a semi in the tropics. Poor but lots of room which was fine for me back then.
My boat was built when sillycone first became popular. Factory used sillycone to everything and it leaked like a sieve. Spent my two years of removing every piece of and fittings on the boat and rebidding with LifeCaulk. were especially obnoxious on the boat because there is no and any water getting below sloshes all over the place. Usually ended up with water over the floorboards on channel passages.
The motor in the well worked fine even with serious waves. Powered most of the way home from Molokai across the Molokai Channel without drowning the motor like a transom mounted would have.
Sailed the hell out of the boat, spent every weekend out sailing and took it to every island but the Big Island when I took leave. I really enjoyed the sailing and the experience was tremendous. Would never buy another one, though. | | | | | 04-09-2012, 17:16 | | | | decades later. Bulkheads are strong as hell, the boat has been sailed in squamish where 25+ kt winds are the norm rather than the exception. The waves dont really get much worse than 3-4 ft chop, maybe where you were at it was bigger.
I often sail it with just the , people keep telling me how dangerous that is and telling me of crazy lee helm but like you say it wants to point into the wind so i find it is strangely balanced with just a 150 genoa with the cars pulled all the way back.
Even in 20-30 with gusts of 50 ive never experienced what you describe with the rudder though.
I read that they made tons and tons of mk 2's and over time the molds got worn out, they then took off the waffle no slip pattern and made some other changes to the to make it simpler and changed the boat model to a columbia 26 k. Ive seen one as there is one parked in the slip opposite to me, it certainly doesnt look to be the same quality as my boat.
Maybe the later 26 mk 2's suffered from problems with worn out molds. | | | | | 16-11-2014, 21:38 | | Boat: 1976 Sabre 28-2
| and boom. Terrible system. Be sure the main has been converted to slab reefing. You'll be reefing often or just not using the main.
volume was tremendous for a 26' boat so it was great for a semi in the tropics. Poor storage but lots of room which was fine for me back then.
My boat was built when sillycone first became popular. Factory used sillycone to everything and it leaked like a sieve. Spent my two years of removing every piece of and fittings on the boat and rebidding with LifeCaulk. Leaks were especially obnoxious on the boat because there is no and any water getting below sloshes all over the place. Usually ended up with water over the floorboards on channel passages.
The motor in the well worked fine even with serious waves. Powered most of the way home from Molokai across the Molokai Channel without drowning the motor like a transom mounted outboard would have.
Sailed the hell out of the boat, spent every weekend out sailing and took it to every island but the Big Island when I took leave. I really enjoyed the sailing and the experience was tremendous. Would never buy another one, though. | | 24-12-2014, 07:25 | | | | on this boat on the web. The boat would be used as a weekend cruiser on a nearby lake. Thanks in advance, Jim
Sent from my using Cruisers Sailing Forum | | | | | 24-12-2014, 07:31 | | Boat: (Cruiser Living On Dirt)
|
➥
| | | | | 24-12-2014, 07:40 | | | | | . I have seen a 1969 Columbia 26 MKII for $4500. She looks to be in good shape from the pictures, but I haven't seen her yet. I'm interested in knowing if this would be a suitable boat for the Bay, maybe light coastal trips. Also, what's the general consensus on the overall quality of Columbia built boats of this era? I realize I'm going to have to go through her with a fine tooth comb to make sure she is sea-worthy, but that's ok, I just want a good quality boat for a starting point. | | Thread Tools | | | | Rate This Thread | :
| | Posting Rules | | post new threads post replies post attachments edit your posts is are code is are are are | | Similar Threads | | Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post | | Want To Buy: | vweedon | Classifieds Archive | 1 | 05-10-2011 20:08 | | For Sale: | Boatguy30 | Classifieds Archive | 2 | 06-09-2011 00:14 | | Crew Available: | Ryan Margott | Crew Archives | 0 | 15-08-2011 15:56 | | | reinellsailor | General Sailing Forum | 21 | 15-08-2011 13:05 | | | RicknSue | Monohull Sailboats | 8 | 29-06-2011 17:29 | Privacy Guaranteed - your email is never shared with anyone, opt out any time. | Go to
Columbia T-26, 1976, with 7000# EZ loader trailer This '76 Columbia T-26 was bought new here in Minneapolis and sailed locally for a couple years when the owner set about a remodel project, described below. at [email protected]
| |  Great choice! Your favorites are temporarily saved for this session. Sign in to save them permanently, access them on any device, and receive relevant alerts. Columbia T-26Columbia T-26 is a 25 ′ 9 ″ / 7.9 m monohull sailboat designed by Alan Payne and built by Columbia Yachts between 1975 and 1977.  Rig and SailsAuxilary power, accomodations, calculations. The theoretical maximum speed that a displacement hull can move efficiently through the water is determined by it's waterline length and displacement. It may be unable to reach this speed if the boat is underpowered or heavily loaded, though it may exceed this speed given enough power. Read more. Classic hull speed formula: Hull Speed = 1.34 x √LWL Max Speed/Length ratio = 8.26 ÷ Displacement/Length ratio .311 Hull Speed = Max Speed/Length ratio x √LWL Sail Area / Displacement RatioA measure of the power of the sails relative to the weight of the boat. The higher the number, the higher the performance, but the harder the boat will be to handle. This ratio is a "non-dimensional" value that facilitates comparisons between boats of different types and sizes. Read more. SA/D = SA ÷ (D ÷ 64) 2/3 - SA : Sail area in square feet, derived by adding the mainsail area to 100% of the foretriangle area (the lateral area above the deck between the mast and the forestay).
- D : Displacement in pounds.
Ballast / Displacement RatioA measure of the stability of a boat's hull that suggests how well a monohull will stand up to its sails. The ballast displacement ratio indicates how much of the weight of a boat is placed for maximum stability against capsizing and is an indicator of stiffness and resistance to capsize. Ballast / Displacement * 100 Displacement / Length RatioA measure of the weight of the boat relative to it's length at the waterline. The higher a boat’s D/L ratio, the more easily it will carry a load and the more comfortable its motion will be. The lower a boat's ratio is, the less power it takes to drive the boat to its nominal hull speed or beyond. Read more. D/L = (D ÷ 2240) ÷ (0.01 x LWL)³ - D: Displacement of the boat in pounds.
- LWL: Waterline length in feet
Comfort RatioThis ratio assess how quickly and abruptly a boat’s hull reacts to waves in a significant seaway, these being the elements of a boat’s motion most likely to cause seasickness. Read more. Comfort ratio = D ÷ (.65 x (.7 LWL + .3 LOA) x Beam 1.33 ) - D: Displacement of the boat in pounds
- LOA: Length overall in feet
- Beam: Width of boat at the widest point in feet
Capsize Screening FormulaThis formula attempts to indicate whether a given boat might be too wide and light to readily right itself after being overturned in extreme conditions. Read more. CSV = Beam ÷ ³√(D / 64) ‘T’ for trailerable. This design was recycled a number of times. Among some of the copies (licensing arrangement unknown) are the HORIZON 26 and COMMODORE 26. Embed this page on your own website by copying and pasting this code. Discover Related Sailboats Horizon 26 (Payne)©2024 Sea Time Tech, LLC This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. columbia t26 sailboat review | | |
Dynamo Moscow
| | |
, Team USSR 1974 (1963)
(1976) Dynamo Moscow
2/20/1940 If anyone were entitled to write a bestselling book about the Russian hockey history, it would definitely be Vladimir Yurzinov. Formally educated as a journalist, Yurzinov played as a center forward for Tarasov and Chernyshev and coached with Tikhonov, Kulagin and Fetisov. The key in Yurzinov's story is his never stopping ability to keep an open mind and search for the new trends and styles.
As a player, Yurzinov had a career of a solid technically savvy elite center. After 15 seasons with the Dynamo Moscow, he managed to set up his team's all time scoring record, to win gold medals with the Team USSR at the world championships and established a reputation of one of the best Russian forwards of the 1960s.
After his retirement from playing hockey in 1972, Yurzinov became an extremely successful coach. Throughout his career, Yurzinov was named a coach of the year in Russia, Latvia, Finland and Switzerland. In 1989, he brought the Dynamo Riga to their best result in the USSR ever (silver medals). He brought the Dynamo Moscow to their first gold medals ever in 1992. He coached TPS Turku to the two gold medals in Finland in 1993 and 1995.
At the 1974 Summit Series, Yurzinov was in his first season as a national team coach. After his coaching debut with the KooVee club in Finland in 1972-1974, he was appointed as head coach of Dynamo Moscow and got an offer from Boris Kulagin to server also as Team USSR assistant coach. Many of the Team USSR 1974 players were former Yurzinov's teammates from the time he played hockey. Transition from playing to coaching went really smooth for a 44-year old Yurzinov.
On a national team level, Yurzinov worked for 15 years with a legend of the Soviet coaching, Victor Tiknonov. They won many international tournaments including numerous World and European title, Olympics, Canada Cup and many more. Interestingly enough, besides strictly professional knowledge of hockey, Yurzinov developed a reputation of a person with great never aging communication skills. He was able to coach successfully top NHL stars and the AAA level players, coach with such different personalities and leaders as Viktor Tikhonov in 1976-1987 and Slava Fetisov in Salt Lake City in 2002.
In 1998, Yurzinov brought Team USSR to the silver medals at the Winter Olympics in Nagano. "I was one step away from becoming a great coach," said Yurzinov after a 0-1 loss to the Czech squad in the final game. Although his coaching career is far from being over, Vladimir Yurzinov IS a great coach.
| |
| | | | | | USSR League | 1957-72 | 489 | 239 | | Team USSR | 1961-69 | 53 | 25 | CAREER HIGHLIGTS: Player's Career: - Played as a Center Forward for the Team USSR and Dynamo Moscow in the USSR Elite League - Dynamo Moscow Captain in 1962-68 - WC Gold : 1963, 1969 - National Awards: USSR Hall of Fame (player), 1963 Coaching Career: - USSR Elite League Clubs : Dynamo Moscow, Dynamo Riga - Dynamo Moscow Head Coach in 1974-80 and 1990-92 - Dynamo Riga Head Coach in 1980-89 - Russia Gold : 1992 - International Leagues : KooVee and TPS Turku in Finland, EHC Kloten in Switzerland - KooVee Player-Coach in 1972-74 - TPS Turku Head Coach in 1992-98 - Finland Gold : 1993, 1995 - Team USSR Coach in 1974-87 - WC Gold : 1975, 1978-79, 1981-83, 1986 - Winter Olympics Gold : 1976, 1984 - Team USSR Coach at the Summit Series 1974 - National Awards: USSR Hall of Fame (coach), 1976 | |
: |
: |
: | |
: |
is brought to you by
| | Advertisement Supported by SOVIET DIMS BEAM AT U.S. EMBASSYBy Bernard Gwertzman Special to The New York Times  WASHINGTON, July 7—The United States said today that Soviet authorities in recent months had sharply reduced the level of microwave radiation beamed at the American Embassy in Moscow. But in its first detailed public account of the situation the State Department nonetheless rebuked the Russians for continuing the radiation even at the current insignificant level. It said this showed “a lack of concern for living and working conditions of our people in Moscow.” Robert L. Funseth, the department spokesman, said at his regular news conference that as a result of official discussions “the strength of the signal beamed to the embassy in Moscow has been greatly reduced from previous recordings, which were themselves well below established United States safety standards.” According to: Mr. Funseth, the level of radiation aimed at the embassy was now less than two microwatts per square centimeter. The installation of aluminum screens outside the embassy earlier this year has further cut the level to less than one microwatt, he said. The New York Times reported on May 2 that the level late last year had gone as high as IS microwatts. American industrial safety standards, Mr. Funseth said. permit as much as 10,000 microwatts per square centimeter. The Soviet Union's stricter industrial standards permit, only 10 microwatts. Mr. Funseth, while providing technical details, refused to comment on why the Soviet Union was beaming the rays, a practice that officials have said began about 16 years ago. Soviet officials have justified the beams as necessary to curtail American electronic listening devices on the roof of upper floors of the embassy building, situated on Tchaikovsky Street in downtown Moscow. American officials have privately conceded that these devices exist to monitor Soviet radio and telephone transmissions. They have also said that the monitoring effort was being impaired by the jamming waves. What has irritated American officials was that the Soviet Embassy on 16th Street in downtown Washington also carries out similar interceptions of radio and phone conversations but has not been subject to the countermeasures because of concern for Americans working in the area. The beaming of radiation against the embassy in Moscow was known only to a few American officials until last February when Ambassador Walter J. Stoessel Jr. briefed his staff on the situation. News of the briefing was leaked to the press. The briefing was held because State Department medical officers feared that the radiation might pose a health hazard over the long run, either to the eyes or to the genetic or nervous system. I Officials have stressed that there was as yet no evidence that the microwaves had been responsible for any illnesses, (past or present. Microwaves are unlike X‐rays and are not ionized. X‐rays in excessive amounts can cause cancer, but no connection has been made between microwaves and cancer. The decision to release information on the embassy situation came after news reports that two young children of em bassy employees had been sent to the United States for examination of unusual blood samples; one has since returned to Moscow. Mr. Funsten said the discussions with the Russians were aimed at ending the microwave signals. “Frankly, we regret that the Soviets have failed to turn off the transmissions completely, and thereby, in our judgment, demonstrating a lack of concern for the living and working conditions of our people in Moscow,” he said. The spokesman was asked why the Russians were being rebuked if in fact they had cut the level below the risk level and he said the continued beams caused a psychological problem. He also said no concessions were made to the Russians in return for their reduction in beams. The microwaves are said to come from across the street from the embassy. There are said to be two such beams aimed at the embassy. Mr. Funseth said the discusDepartment had signed a contract with Johns Hopkins University to conduct a survey to see whether there has ever been any correlation between the microwaves and the health of past and present’ embassy employees.  | | | | | | | | | |
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
It takes into consideration "reported" sail area, displacement and length at waterline. The higher the number the faster speed prediction for the boat. A cat with a number 0.6 is likely to sail 6kts in 10kts wind, a cat with a number of 0.7 is likely to sail at 7kts in 10kts wind. KSP = (Lwl*SA÷D)^0.5*0.5
1976. 26'. 7'. 3'. Michigan. $8,500. Description: Ready to Sail for Summer 2021 Motivated Seller! Excellent Sailboat with 6'2" Headroom comes with an 8ft Walker Bay Dinghy, (6) boat stands, electric start outboard, electric kicker motor and many, many upgrades (see below).
Its sail area/displacement ratio 15.24. Its auxiliary power tank, manufactured by undefined, runs on undefined. COLUMBIA 26 MK 2 has retained its value as a result of superior building, a solid reputation, and a devoted owner base. Read on to find out more about COLUMBIA 26 MK 2 and decide if it is a fit for your boating needs.
The Columbia 26 mk 2 is a 25.58ft masthead sloop designed by William H. Tripp Jr. and built in fiberglass by Columbia Yachts between 1969 and 1977. 950 units have been built. The Columbia 26 mk 2 is a moderate weight sailboat which is slightly under powered. It is very stable / stiff and has a good righting capability if capsized.
Columbia 26 MK 2 is a 25′ 7″ / 7.8 m monohull sailboat designed by William H. Tripp Jr. and built by Columbia Yachts between 1969 and 1977. ... Sail area in square feet, derived by adding the mainsail area to 100% of the foretriangle area (the lateral area above the deck between the mast and the forestay). D: ...
1976 26' Columbia MK II sailboat for sale in Annapolis Maryland. Home. Register & Post. View All Sailboats. Search. ... 26' Columbia MK II. Year. Length. Beam. Draft. Location. Price. 1976. 26' 8' 4'4' Maryland. $3,000. Description: I have a 1976 Columbia MK II in nice condition, i just don't have time for it anymore and need to get rid of it ...
The Columbia 26 is a 26.33ft masthead sloop designed by Columbia Yachts and built in fiberglass by Columbia Yachts between 1963 and 1969. 799 units have been built. The Columbia 26 is a heavy sailboat which is a reasonably good performer. It is very stable / stiff and has a good righting capability if capsized. It is best suited as a coastal ...
Columbia 26 is a 26′ 4″ / 8 m monohull sailboat designed by Columbia Yachts and built by Columbia Yachts between 1963 and 1969. Great choice! Your favorites are temporarily saved for this session. Sign in to save them permanently, access them on any device, and receive relevant alerts.
Need a boat moved and wonder who to call? See Shorty Pen's boat transport directory. For other websites to look for sailboats see Find your sailboat links. In the menu top or bottom select the make of boat or the first letter of the boats name. For example: The Chrysler Buccaneer could be under B or C or Chrysler.
1 of 3. If you are a boat enthusiast looking to get more information on specs, built, make, etc. of different boats, then here is a complete review of COLUMBIA 26. Built by Columbia Yachts and designed by undefined, the boat was first built in 1963. It has a hull type of Fin Keel and LOA is 8.03. Its sail area/displacement ratio 16.09.
Columbia MKII 26', 1976. Ready to sail away sailboat with main sail, small storm sail, medium jib and full jib and spinnaker with haul up bag. It is currently located at Lake Pepin in Lake City, MN on the dry and can be looked at your leisure. Just get the exact location from me to find the storage yard. It has a cabin forward sleeping two ...
Columbia 26 buy - Year Built: 1976, Length: 7.80 m, Width: 2.60 m - Information, Photos and Contact Details for this Boat. (ID: 475693)
Boat: 1976 Sabre 28-2. Posts: 7,505 Re: Columbia 26 MKII ? My first boat was a brand new Col 26 Mk II. Had a love-hate relationship with the boat. ... they then took off the waffle no slip pattern and made some other changes to the mold to make it simpler and changed the boat model to a columbia 26 k. Ive seen one as there is one parked in the ...
Go to. Columbia T-26, 1976, with 7000# EZ loader trailer. This '76 Columbia T-26 was bought new here in Minneapolis and sailed locally for a couple years when the owner set about a remodel project, described below. As the project neared completion the owner suffered some profound health issues and the boat spent many years in outside storage ...
1976 Columbia 26K. This Columbia sailboat has a hull made of fiberglass and has an overall length of 25.58 feet. The beam (or width) of this craft is 86 inches. This sailboat is rigged as a Sloop. The sail area for the boat is 310 square feet. Approximate displacement for the vessel comes in at around 5900 pounds.
Columbia 26 preowned sailboats for sale by owner. Columbia 26 used sailboats for sale by owner.
It takes into consideration "reported" sail area, displacement and length at waterline. The higher the number the faster speed prediction for the boat. A cat with a number 0.6 is likely to sail 6kts in 10kts wind, a cat with a number of 0.7 is likely to sail at 7kts in 10kts wind. KSP = (Lwl*SA÷D)^0.5*0.5
Columbia T-26 is a 25′ 9″ / 7.9 m monohull sailboat designed by Alan Payne and built by Columbia Yachts between 1975 and 1977. ... the more easily it will carry a load and the more comfortable its motion will be. The lower a boat's ratio is, the less power it takes to drive the boat to its nominal hull speed or beyond. ... 1976 • 25 ′ 9 ...
Forum Listing; Marketplace; Advanced Search; About The Boat; Boat Review Forum; SailNet is a forum community dedicated to Sailing enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about saili
Prior to 1958, the last defense of the America's Cup had been in 1937, by the J-Class yacht Ranger, owned by Harold S. "Mike" Vanderbilt.The J-Class rules prescribing a vessel of some 120 feet in length were promoted by Vanderbilt and others for the defense planned for 1958, but economic concerns and the desire among aspiring competitors to employ smaller dual-purpose yachts won the day.
At the 1974 Summit Series, Yurzinov was in his first season as a national team coach. After his coaching debut with the KooVee club in Finland in 1972-1974, he was appointed as head coach of Dynamo Moscow and got an offer from Boris Kulagin to server also as Team USSR assistant coach. Many of the Team USSR 1974 players were former Yurzinov's ...
It takes into consideration "reported" sail area, displacement and length at waterline. The higher the number the faster speed prediction for the boat. A cat with a number 0.6 is likely to sail 6kts in 10kts wind, a cat with a number of 0.7 is likely to sail at 7kts in 10kts wind. KSP = (Lwl*SA÷D)^0.5*0.5
The New York Times reported on May 2 that the level late last year had gone as high as IS microwatts. American industrial safety standards, Mr. Funseth said. permit as much as 10,000 microwatts ...